Chatfield, Charles

Birth Name Chatfield, Charles
Gender male

Narrative

Not on 1860 census.
Apparently abandoned his wife 17 Oct 1860.

Events

Event Date Place Description Sources
Birth 10 March 1830 Crawford Co., Ohio, USA    
Residence 1850 Marengo, McHenry Co., Illinois, USA    
Residence 1851 California, USA    

Parents

Relation to main person Name Birth date Death date Relation within this family (if not by birth)
Father Chatfield, Silas19 September 17822 April 1866
Mother Grover, Rachel23 March 17851870
    Brother     Chatfield, Norman 26 October 1803 28 June 1864
    Brother     Chatfield, Oliver Nelson 12 April 1807 13 March 1870
    Sister     Chatfield, Nancy 28 October 1809
    Sister     Chatfield, Fanny M 1810 1880
    Sister     Chatfield, Hettie Esther 25 May 1811 16 December 1894
    Sister     Chatfield, Lydia C 23 October 1813
    Sister     Chatfield, Rachel 13 April 1815 17 December 1844
    Brother     Chatfield, Silas Porter 5 April 1817 9 December 1876
    Sister     Chatfield, Sallie or Sally 13 March 1821 19 April 1841
    Sister     Chatfield, Lucy 28 January 1825 2 December 1914
    Sister     Chatfield, Hannah 8 September 1828 14 May 1917
         Chatfield, Charles 10 March 1830

Families

Family of Chatfield, Charles and Handy, Maria

Married Wife Handy, Maria ( * about 1830 + ... )
   
Event Date Place Description Sources
Divorce     Y  
Marriage 12 April 1850 Winnebago Co., Illinois, USA    
  Narrative

CHATFIELD, CHARLES. - HANDY, MARIA - 1850-04-12 - IL - WINNEBAGO Co.
-----
Sacramento Daily Union, Volume 19, Number 2845, 9 May 1860
Another Divorce. — A complaint was filed yesterday in the District Court by Maria CHATFIELD, praying for a divorce from her husband, Charles Chatfield. The complaint sets forth that the said party were married in Illinois in 1850, and immediately afterward emigrated to this State, where they lived together as man and wife until about the 17th of October, when the defendant abandoned her, and since which time she has been compelled to support herself. The parties reside in this city.
-----
Sacramento Daily Union, Volume 19, Number 2892, 3 July 1860
Divorce Suit.— ln the case of Maria Chatfield vs. Charles CHATFIELD, which was a suit for divorce on the ground of adultery, charged to have been commited by the defendant May 7th, a decree was entered in the Sixth District Court dismissing the bill on the ground of collusion between the parties. The plaintitf afterwards moved for an order setting aside the finding and decree, and for a new trial, on the ground that the decision was against law and evidence. The District Court, after reviewing the facts in the case, comes to the conclusion that the plaintiff was cognizant of the alleged crime and assented thereto, and that the collusion between the parties was so apparent that the motion for a new trial must be annulled. An order was directed to be entered accordingly.

  Attributes
Type Value Notes Sources
_UID 56C1917434DFD511B337709A55C100001FC3
 

Attributes

Type Value Notes Sources
_UID 55C1917434DFD511B337709A55C100001EB3